Re: OT: Why People Are Not Free? (rant)

From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 03/28/05 

Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:06:01 +0100

I read in sci.electronics.design that Keith Williams <krw@att.bizzzz>
wrote (in <MPG.1cb1db49f7ecd46298998b@news.individual.net>) about 'OT:
Why People Are Not Free? (rant)', on Mon, 28 Mar 2005:
>In article <3IR1e.27945$qN3.12509@trndny01>, palmtree117@juno.com
>says...
>> OK, I'm on news.verizon.net with outlook express now, I finally got it to
>> work, does this look any better??? (Mr. Grise over there, who seemed
>> especially affected, you can be the judge)
>
>Ok, now you've graduated from "Google lamer" to "top-posting
>dolt". ;-) Quote and respond (or "conversational" mode) is the
>preferred method of Usenet posting. Snipping the irrelevant bits is
>good too.
>

Keith, you are being overly abrupt and unfriendly. If you responded to
most of the men here in that way, you'd get a very dusty answer. It
almost seems as though you are indulging in the probability that
Sci-girl won't descend to that level. 

-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
Quantcast