Re: Problem with Spice - it won't allow me to change bounds of graph

"Michael Noone" <mnoone.uiuc.edu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns962A84F71647Dmnooneuiucedu127001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Larry Brasfield" <donotspam_larry_brasfield@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:0bX2e.28$oI2.743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>> Using that source, I cannot replicate your problem. (I did
>> use my finger on the mouse rather than my tongue!) Zoom-
>> to-fit is active. Zooming works as Mr. Monsen describes.
>>
>> Maybe it would help to describe what you are actually
>> expecting to see. The trouble may reside there.

This still seems to be the case, but maybe it will clear
up once you get a time-varying source per below.

>> Looking at your circuit, I find myself wondering if you
>> have dropped your 1 mS response time requirement.
>> What that unreal when you mentioned it awhile back?
>
> Hmm this is odd indeed. I was expecting for the x axis to have a range of
> V3=0-10 volts in 01.V increments. I was then hoping to see a nice little
> linear line that would be something like Y=30X. Is this what you are
> seeing? Instead - All I see is the x axis having a range of v3 = 9.9-10V,
> in 0.1V increments.
>
> I am still hoping for 1ms response time though. I was hoping the simulator
> could tell me if that was a possibility - but I can't seem to get it to
> show me anything besides V3=9.9-10V!
>
> Any suggestions?

Right click on V3, hit the "Advanced" button, select
the PWL radio button (in "Functions" pane), and fill
in the piece-wise-linear specification of an excitation
function for which you would like to see the transient
response.

As for suggestions about how to deal with the response
you get, I've stated my piece on that in earlier posts.

> Best regards,

Likewise.

--
--Larry Brasfield
email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
Above views may belong only to me.


.