Re: Job Description(s)
- From: Active8 <reply2group@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:59:59 GMT
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:24:56 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:
> I read in sci.electronics.design that bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote (in
> <1112548149.107780.129750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) about 'Job
> Description(s)', on Sun, 3 Apr 2005:
>
>>Strange to find myself agreeing with Jim,
>
> If you stuck to electronics, you'd find a great deal of common ground.
> You'll never change each other's politics, so why not relax and enjoy
> the engineering?
I'm with you bro'. Notice how nicely JT and Win play together
despite having opposite political views?
--
Best Regards,
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Job Description(s)
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Job Description(s)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Job Description(s)
- References:
- Job Description(s)
- From: Genome
- Re: Job Description(s)
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Job Description(s)
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Job Description(s)
- From: John Woodgate
- Job Description(s)
- Prev by Date: Re: Job Description(s)
- Next by Date: Re: Job Description(s)
- Previous by thread: Re: Job Description(s)
- Next by thread: Re: Job Description(s)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|