Re: simple frequecny multiplier
- From: "Frank Raffaeli" <SNIPrf_man_frTHIS@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Apr 2005 20:18:12 -0700
colin wrote:
> "Mark" <makolber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1112838867.605964.21180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > probably better off with a pll
> >
> > mark
> >
>
> i dont see how it'l be better, it can only add to the phase noise
wich im
> trying hard to avoid, and lot more complication wich is probably
harder to
> debug then a single stage distorting amplifier with tuned output.
maybe the
> fundamental wil be beter supresed but this wil be easy to supres
further
> with another filter.
>
> Colin.
The advice Mark gave to use a PLL is pretty sound. What is the phase
noise requirement?
You could end up with lower phase noise using a PLL than with a
multiplier. If you do use
a multiplier, consider a step recovery diode if you're trying to do it
in one go. Otherwise,
consider a two or three stage multiplier.
The best you can do with a 25x multipler is 25x the phase noise offset
of the source. The phase
noise of the PLL will be dominated by the VCO if you do it right, and
that is determined
mostly by the loaded Q.
see the following text:
Microwave Circuit Design Using Linear and Nonlinear Techniques
by Vendelin, Pavio, and Rohde.
Frank Raffaeli
http://www.aomwireless.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: simple frequecny multiplier
- From: colin
- Re: simple frequecny multiplier
- References:
- simple frequecny multiplier
- From: colin
- Re: simple frequecny multiplier
- From: Mark
- Re: simple frequecny multiplier
- From: colin
- simple frequecny multiplier
- Prev by Date: OT: just had to try this one more time
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Civil War Narrowly Averted in Schiavo Case
- Previous by thread: Re: simple frequecny multiplier
- Next by thread: Re: simple frequecny multiplier
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|