Re: XP is garbage
- From: John Woodgate <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:44:48 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Frank Bemelman <f.bemelmanq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote (in <425b8934$0$141$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) about 'XP is garbage', on Tue, 12 Apr 2005:
99.9% compatible. That is exactly the problem. Software running on our machines is 99.9% compatible with the OS. Tasks within the the OS are 99.9% compatible with each other. Drivers are 99.9% compatible with the hardware. The alternative browser that is 99.9% compatible, the PDF reader that is 99.9% compatible. In short, you have a 99.9% reliable machine.
If you have six things that are each 99.9% compatible, the overall compatibility is 99.4%. If incompatibility = crash, then you have a 99.4% reliable machine. But the number of potentially-fatal incompatibilities is probably much larger. For 100, the overall figure is 90.48%
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
.
- References:
- XP is garbage
- From: John Larkin
- Re: XP is garbage
- From: Joerg
- Re: XP is garbage
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: XP is garbage
- From: Colin Dawson
- Re: XP is garbage
- From: Chris Carlen
- Re: XP is garbage
- From: Frank Bemelman
- XP is garbage
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: A Problem with "the power of prayer"
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Thread Hijack: Drugs vs. War
- Previous by thread: Re: XP is garbage
- Next by thread: Re: XP is garbage
- Index(es):
Loading