Re: They died for nothing
- From: John Woodgate <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:33:25 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote (in <1113490225.325244.210970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) about 'They died for nothing', on Thu, 14 Apr 2005:
Foolish of me, I know, but I retain the illusion that some human beings are capable of improvement.
Have you improved recently, and, if so, in what way?
Answer must be limited to 10 kB maximum. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. There are two sides to every question, except 'What is a Moebius strip?' http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: They died for nothing
- From: Genome
- Re: They died for nothing
- References:
- Re: They died for nothing
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: They died for nothing
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: They died for nothing
- Prev by Date: Re: XP is great
- Next by Date: Re: EMC advice - MSP430 design - 4 layer Vs 2 layer
- Previous by thread: Re: They died for nothing
- Next by thread: Re: They died for nothing
- Index(es):