Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: learning@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:01:09 -0600
In <CYydnbzCqt78bsPfRVn-sQ@xxxxxxxxxxx>, on 04/14/05
at 06:49 PM, "Charles Schuler" <charleschuler@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> Micro$oft's part
>> was finding immoral and illegal methodologies to merchandise it.
>Huh? You make very little sense!
They stole, blackmailed, and used extortion to obtain an illegal monopoly.
Weren't you paying attention during the trail? Ignorance is no excuse.
JB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Charles Schuler
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- References:
- XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Joerg
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: John Larkin
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: JeffM
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Charles Schuler
- XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are restaurant RF gizmos so complicated?
- Next by Date: Re: Why are restaurant RF gizmos so complicated?
- Previous by thread: Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Next by thread: Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
