Re: Radar Jamming
- From: "Andy" <andysharpe@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Apr 2005 15:52:56 -0700
A.Nonny Mouse wrote:
> These days, most stationary speed traps in my area use laser guns.
About
> the only place radar is still used is in patrol cars while in motion.
>
> I've wondered about the effectiveness of mounting a set of corner
> reflectors on a spinning disk (inside a radar-transparent enclosure,
of
> course). You could increase or decrease your reported speed by
choosing
> the direction and speed you spin the disk. This is completely
passive,
> just like your idea, but has the advantage of being low-tech.
>
> I'm not an RF guy but I assume that a fairly small intentional
reflector
> can produce a reflection that is larger than the backscatter from the
> car body. The spinning will also impart some sort of sinusoidal
> variation to the reflected signal frequency, but I don't know if this
is
> a good or bad thing. The widget could be mounted on the roof (not so
> good for cosmetics), or possibly inside the vehicle (much better).
>
> Does this idea have any merit?
Andy writes:
That sounds like a neat thing to try. I would mount three mirrors as
a corner reflector, which essentially BEAM the laser signal back to the
source --- very directional , and a very high reflection coefficient.
Then, if the assembly was mounted on a bigass speaker assembly, which
was modulated with an audio tone ( 2V/lamba again) it should do the
same
as the backscatter tag I have mentioned before, only at light
frequencies.
I would really like to try this --- the three mirror technique is
used
for enhanced reflectors for sailboats - to give a bigger radar return-
only
they are made of metal to be useful to radar signals....
I think you are onto a good idea, but a three corner reflector will
give
a much better RCS return since this arrangement is like a beam
reflector.
You gotta try it out with a laser lever or pointer to see how well it
works, but the return is very high......
If you, or anyone else, would like to BS about this, I would be
please to correspond.
Andy at andysharpe@xxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Barry Lennox
- Re: Radar Jamming
- References:
- Radar Jamming
- From: Harvz
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Andy
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: A.Nonny Mouse
- Radar Jamming
- Prev by Date: Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Next by Date: Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Previous by thread: Re: Radar Jamming
- Next by thread: Re: Radar Jamming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|