Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: John Woodgate <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:16:13 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Charles Schuler <charleschuler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote (in <KOedneLLgbjmf8PfRVn-vQ@xxxxxxxxxxx>) about 'XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed', on Thu, 14 Apr 2005:
Later in my career, I noticed that everything sucked for many of those wet-behind-the-ears critics ... the professors, the food, the lab equipment, the textbooks, and just about everything but them!
Well, that's what they are supposed, as students, to do! Challenge the established order, in order to change it for the better. But their appalling incoherence disguises this. If they were to say 'This, that AND the other are in considerable need of improvement.', you might not be so dismayed by their attitude.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Charles Schuler
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- References:
- XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Fritz Schlunder
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Charles Schuler
- XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are restaurant RF gizmos so complicated?
- Next by Date: Re: Convert UTM to Longitude/Latitude?
- Previous by thread: Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Next by thread: Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Index(es):