Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: TCS <The-Central-Scrutinizer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:59:11 -0500
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:04:30 -0400, Charles Schuler <charleschuler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I ain't flaming you, but I think you need to see how viruses work before
>> you can declare every OS to be vulnerable to hackers. Its one thing to
>> break into a computer, its another to be able to take it over. Can't do
>> that with a MAC, linux, OS/2, or actually, any other OS. Just windows.
>You have made an unequivocal statement and you are dead wrong. There is
>nothing special about Windows, other than its popularity.
and the fact that any process can write to any part of the system at any
time.
.
- References:
- XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Fritz Schlunder
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Charles Schuler
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: learning
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Charles Schuler
- XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Prev by Date: Re: Amp output Z
- Next by Date: Re: Amp output Z
- Previous by thread: Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Next by thread: Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading