Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: learning@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 16:01:29 -0600
In <CIadnfy1_J7eF_zfRVn-1Q@xxxxxxxxxxx>, on 04/16/05
at 05:57 PM, "Charles Schuler" <charleschuler@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> As Arthur said to Susan, whom he was being forced to marry in the
>> movie........... "your such an ***"
>You have now denigrated me inferentially and that strongly indicates that
> you are bankrupt for any reasonable responses and thus must now resort
>to name calling. You have lost big time, my friend. You might want to
>review the rules of reasonable debating. You are still "dead wrong" and
>now have become shrill and id-driven. Note that I never denigrated you
>and would never sink that low.
Aww, we ain't friends, and your responses won't win any prizes for
debating. In fact, you have yet to reply with anything beyond a dopey
quote. Debating? Anytime my 'friend' any time.
Heck, you didn't even pick no my spelling :-) It should have been written
"you're such an ***"
It would help if you posted just what you do think, rather than just
throwing out a silly quote every time anyone posted a message you are not
able to deal with, or think clearly on. Explain why you do that, when it
would be just as easy for anyone on the other side of it, to find a quote
that they think applies, and just keep posting it. Don't talk about
debate, when you don't even participate.
When you posted a denigrating remark about me, I replied and all you chose
to offer was some standard, off the shelf quote from someone else. So far,
all you have ever said on this whole topic is that phony quote, and "you
are dead wrong" Hardly words to win a debate with, and certainly not even
worthy of your tombstone. I'm not wrong, I am quite right about the issue.
I said that I am learning from people on this list. Its just that you are
teaching all the wrong lessons.
Have a good day.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: Charles Schuler
- Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- References:
- XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Fritz Schlunder
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Fritz Schlunder
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: learning
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Fritz Schlunder
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: learning
- Re: XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- From: Fritz Schlunder
- XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: learning
- Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: Fritz Schlunder
- Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: Charles Schuler
- Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: learning
- Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: Charles Schuler
- Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: learning
- Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- From: Charles Schuler
- XP has no significant bugs that any significant number of users want fixed
- Prev by Date: Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- Next by Date: Re: Freescale doesn't want to be bothered
- Previous by thread: Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- Next by thread: Re: XP has no significant bugs other than those of its defenders
- Index(es):