Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Bob Stephens <roberts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:37:02 -0700
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:21:13 GMT, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:23:32 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> I got an "energy ticket"... back in the Carter double-nickel days ;-)
>
> Let's not blame Jimmy for what was actually an Imperial Edict from your
> fair-haired proto-neocon, Richard M. Nixon, AKA Trickee Dickee.
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
I thought the '55 saves lives' campaign was bogus, but I still kind of like
the idea - if you must arbitrarily set the limit at 55 - of anything
between 55 and 75 being an energy offence as opposed to an insurance hiking
moving violation and crime against humanity. Sort of like the pay to
pollute gambit for industry.
Bob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Radar Jamming
- References:
- Radar Jamming
- From: Harvz
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Andy
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: A.Nonny Mouse
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Mac
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Ken Taylor
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Keith Williams
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Radar Jamming
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
- Radar Jamming
- Prev by Date: Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed.
- Next by Date: Re: Why are restaurant RF gizmos so complicated?
- Previous by thread: Re: Radar Jamming
- Next by thread: Re: Radar Jamming
- Index(es):
Loading