Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: Rich Grise <richgrise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:55:34 GMT
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:24:24 -0700, Boomer wrote:
> That may well be an excellent solution to this dilemma as well. Again,
> if I can implement a way to lock the signal to 491.5kHz with a minimum
> of extra parts, I'd have this thing whipped!!!
>
> Thanx, I'll look into this as well!!!
If 491.52 kHz is close enough, you could use a 4.9152 MHz crystal, and
just divide it by ten. If you use a 74x90 (probably HC these days), you
can divide by 5 first, then 2, to get a square wave.
Mouser # ...
Ah, crap, the catalog page is .pdf. (can't copy/paste an image of a
part number )-; )
http://www.mouser.com/catalog/621/588.pdf
Good Luck!
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: Boomer
- Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- References:
- AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: Boomer
- Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: Tim Shoppa
- Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: Boomer
- Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: Tim Shoppa
- Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: Boomer
- Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: mike742
- Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- From: Boomer
- AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- Prev by Date: Re: reducing 12V+ source voltage with a potentiometer
- Next by Date: Re: XP is garbage
- Previous by thread: Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- Next by thread: Re: AD654-based VFC(VCO) drop-in
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
