Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- From: kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Smith)
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:21:15 +0000 (UTC)
In article <426e9d1f$0$83051$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ian Stirling <root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[... batteries in nasty environment ...]
>Actually, lithium works quite well for this.
>The lower the average charge state is, the greater the cells life.
>As long as you have proper control, and don't overdischarge (under 3V)
>or overcharge (more than 4.2/43V), and match the cells right, lithium
>could be a fairly good match.
>
>Cost is of course a problem.
The Lithiums I was looking at didn't like the cold and yes were very
costly.
I could also never get it on paper that they had solved the "exploding in
flames" problem on the higher power ones. I could for the smaller ones
though.
In the end SLAs just looked like the right one to pick.
--
--
kensmith@xxxxxxxxx forging knowledge
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- From: Mook Johnson
- Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- From: keith
- Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- From: Ken Smith
- Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- From: Ian Stirling
- sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- Prev by Date: Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- Next by Date: Re: Audio Tachometer for 2 stroke engine
- Previous by thread: Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- Next by thread: Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading