Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- From: kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Smith)
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 13:59:22 +0000 (UTC)
In article <4275f3d5$0$559$ed2e19e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ian Stirling <root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Ken Smith <kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In article <426e9d1f$0$83051$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
[...]
>> I could also never get it on paper that they had solved the "exploding in
>> flames" problem on the higher power ones. I could for the smaller ones
>> though.
>
>As long as you don't screw up on the charge control, or overheat
>them by packing too densely, or not taking care of temperature
>and charging, or discharging, they are fine.
I had no control over the temperature of the environment. I could control
the charging but I did have to charge them in any temperature.
>> In the end SLAs just looked like the right one to pick.
>
>Still good, in many cases.
>Annoyingly heavy in many others though.
Yes they ended up being most of the weight of the product. That was
considered OK. If they had more energy per unit volume, it would be
better. Zinc-air would be a lot better from that point of view but they
can't be sealed in use.
--
--
kensmith@xxxxxxxxx forging knowledge
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- From: Ian Stirling
- Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- References:
- Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- From: Ian Stirling
- Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- Prev by Date: Re: This is cool. And I NEVER use the word cool.
- Next by Date: Re: Proposed Assembler Commands
- Previous by thread: Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- Next by thread: Re: sealed (air tight) rechargable battery technology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|