Re: Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- From: "Tim Shoppa" <shoppa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 May 2005 10:04:14 -0700
> I should mention though, that I only need a chip
> with common control lines - so really the ideal chip would
> only have 8 + 64 + 3 + 2 = 77 pins
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to do, but if you're making
eight byte-wide addressable output ports you should know there are
easier and denser ways of doing it! Microcontrollers with 64 bits of
digital output will be the least-pins approach. But simply 8 octal
registers will be easier to lay out on a PCB than a bunch of
multiplexers.
Tim.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- From: Michael Noone
- Re: Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- References:
- Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- From: Michael Noone
- Re: Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- From: Keith Williams
- Re: Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- From: Michael Noone
- Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- Prev by Date: Re: General Questions about Tantalum and Electrolytic Capacitors
- Next by Date: Re: Court authorized wiretaps in the U.S. surged last year
- Previous by thread: Re: Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- Next by thread: Re: Do any octal 3 to 8 demultiplexers exist?
- Index(es):