Re: Court authorized wiretaps in the U.S. surged last year

John Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 03 May 2005 06:46:51 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
> <see_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 May 2005 19:29:13 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
>>> <see_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes. I find the argument of, well marijuana is harmful, so it
>>>> should be illegal, completely bogus. Its got f'all do do with
>>>> state what someone chooses to do with their own bodies.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Fine, so long as the state does not facilitate the harm, and does
>>> not pay any resulting medical expenses.
>>>
>>
>> And I knew that was coming...Its a completely bogus argument.
>>
>
> It's not bogus in San Francisco. Drug abuse is a serious burden on
> public medical resources already. We keep the drinking water clean and
> the rats out of the restaurants in the cause of public health; so why
> not restrict the supply of heroin?
>

Its bogus because we can use the *same* argument to justify banning
*anything*.

You name it, anything you like, and I well tell why it causes harm to
something.

Do you wish to ban everything? If not, the why chose one over another?

Kevin Aylward
informationEXTRACT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.


.

Quantcast