Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 12:10:48 -0700
On Wed, 4 May 2005 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken
Smith) wrote:
>
>Now, can you suggest two places where the US sent in troops for the good
>of the people living there? I suggest two because I can think of one
>where it could be claimed if you stretch a point. You suggested this was
>always the case, so you should have a large number of examples.
UK, twice
France, twice
Netherlands
Belgium, twice
Denmark
Morocco
Greece
Italy
Germany
Austria
China
South Korea
Australia
New Guinea
Micronesia
Burma
Philipines
and a few more.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Ken Smith
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- References:
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Ken Smith
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Ken Smith
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Prev by Date: Re: Need a little part ID help.
- Next by Date: Re: earphone cable?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
