Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Paul Burke <paul@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 09:40:34 +0100
John S. Dyson wrote:
Historically (and even today), Europe, for example, is noted to be a source of incredibly incompetent and emotionally driven wars. Was it prudent to 'save' Europe when they would likely be impossible to save?
I wouldn't really call disliking being invaded by Nazis emotional. But in the USA's short history, they haven't done too badly for wars- excluding the two WWs, there's been Mexico, Red Indians several times over, some minor internal disagreement over whupping blacks, the Philippenes, Korea, Vietnam/ Cambodia/ Laos, Panama, Grenada, Cuba (porcine intervention), not to mention a few extra wars conducted by proxy. I don't think that's quite the full list.
Though it's true that direct intervention in Europe was often considered a last resort, especially when they weren't sure which side they agreed with most.
Paul Burke .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: John S. Dyson
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- References:
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Ken Smith
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Ken Smith
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: John S. Dyson
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Prev by Date: Microcontroller VGA output
- Next by Date: Re: Microcontroller VGA output
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Index(es):