Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Smith)
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 01:13:26 +0000 (UTC)
In article <bgdv71dl5s27hcgojcmdjetmhhs17vsdkv@xxxxxxx>,
Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
>Maybe the "tax cut" logic could be taken to its ultimate conclusion-
>borrow 100% of government spending (perhaps adding a few new programs
>to increase the poularity) and collect zero taxes. ;-) It might
>actually work if government was at 1910 levels (the government would
>be parasitic off of the currency rather than taxing the economy). Of
>course it's going in the other direction for the forseeable future,
>just not as fast as it was.
Why not fund it with bake sales?
Those army pledge drives will be great fun. You get to drive a tank to
work just for donating $1000.
--
--
kensmith@xxxxxxxxx forging knowledge
.
- References:
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Keith Williams
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Prev by Date: Re: DIN-rail mount cases/housings
- Next by Date: Re: Programmed device - labelling requirements?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
- Index(es):