Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: John Perry <jp@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 23:42:07 -0400
Roger Johansson wrote:
Tony Williams wrote:
Nice pictures.
....but very wrong (electrically speaking).
The first picture shows a 1/3 turn, as the wire goes straight tangentially on the outside, result 35mV.
There's no such thing as a partial turn. Think about it. If you have current flow, you have a circuit, which means you have a complete loop (i. e., turn). It doesn't matter much whether the return path is 1/16" away, or 12" away, or 100ft away. It's still a complete loop.
The larger the loop is, the more opportunity there is for parasitics to siphon off some of the field; but the core is generally very high mu, and offsets the parasitics almost completely.
That's why standard current transformers (remember the discussion of a few days ago?) work quite well with just a single cable threaded through the core.
Picture 1 gave a tiny voltage because a tiny fraction of the field passed through the core hole, inducing voltages into the near wires without being cancelled by corresponding induction into the opposite wires on the core.
Picture 2 had roughly equal and cancelling fields inside the hole.
Picture 3 had a slightly higher voltage than 1, probably because the wires were not bent exactly at the same angles, so got a trifle more of the uncancelled field in the hole.
Picture 4 is picture 1 plus 2 copies of picture 2. Same voltage out as 1.
I don't know how many turns you had on the secondary, butput the primary wire inside the hole and the output voltage will be very high if you've wound it at all like a CT (which is what a GFCI or RCD is, after all).
Put the primary inside the hole, loop it back inside again without going around the core, and you'll have zero out. That's a GFCI/RCD.
jp .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- References:
- Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: bigcat
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: bigcat
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Roger Johansson
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- From: Roger Johansson
- Core imbalance in RCDs
- Prev by Date: Re: LED Apparent Brightness
- Next by Date: Re: Resistor pulse handling?
- Previous by thread: Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- Next by thread: Re: Core imbalance in RCDs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|