Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 May 2005 15:19:11 GMT
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:4282D210.35E58FCC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> A friend of mine (ex military intelligence) suggested allowing people
> with concealed weapons permits to carry onboard aircraft.
Along with US Law Enforcement personnel that might be travelling.
> Aside from
> the problem that there is no guarantee of a minimum level of
> competence among civilians permitted to carry weapons (there really
> isn't for police either), I don't think its a bad idea.
>
If you really think about that;it does complicate the situation well past
the point where the chances of successful hijack are slim to none.
You cannot plan for such an unknown.
Also,this would be a situation where the very lives of the passengers,and
on-ground civilians would be at stake.One could even offer a course for
concealed carry/cockpit defense.
The one problem I see is that where armed pilots would be firing towards
the rear of the plane thru the cockpit doorway,with possible
injuries/deaths of passengers,armed people in the passenger compartment
would be firing towards the PILOTS,the most flight-critical item. ;-}
The cockpit instrumentation has backups and very low probability of hitting
something that would prevent the plane from flying/landing.The pilots would
be the main worry.
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- References:
- OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- From: Luhan Monat
- Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- From: Bob Monsen
- Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- From: Bob Monsen
- Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- From: Mac
- Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- Prev by Date: Re: new scopes
- Next by Date: Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- Previous by thread: Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- Next by thread: Re: OT:Prevent Airline Hijacking
- Index(es):
Loading