Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: R Adsett <radsett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:44:37 -0400
In article <lfd281hl7ib4d2b07t7q3nt7kk5n5hl9eu@xxxxxxx>,
cdsmith69NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> On Tue, 10 May 2005 13:08:49 -0400, R Adsett
> <radsett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> >I once did the SW for a variant that used a pair of controllers to
> >control a series wound traction motor in an H-bridge configuration. We
> >had the current oscillating at about +-700A IIRC with the motor reversing
> >direction every few seconds. I could swear I could feel the magnetic
> >field off of that sucker. Twitching 00 cable does make for an intriguing
> >sight.
>
> That reminds me of another thing. Way back when I started at the
> forklift company in 1994, the engineering department was a bit
> lacking in equipment. So for a while, we had to use an old WYSE
> terminal for debugging. The forklift had a serial port on the
> controller board and you could plug in a terminal or computer
> with terminal program, and look at things like all the sensor
> readings, examine memory contents, etc.
>
> When we would run the lift motor at about half PWM, which
> resulted in maybe 250 amps or so, the image on the CRT of that
> old WYSE terminal would shake up and down about 1/4 inch, even
> though it was on a table a couple feet away.
Seen that too. It sounds like we had similar experiences at roughly the
same time. Any chance your lift truck was a reach? :)
Speaking of current limits. The controller was designed, over my
objections, to use the NMI to signal an over-current. The hardware would
cut out the PWM for one cycle and leave it up to the SW to correct the
problem more permanently. Under the right circumstances, which of course
were not too hard to produce, you would get a cascade of NMIs as the SW
tried to react to one NMI and failed to do so before the next occurred.
The end result was either a small hesitation which was not really
noticable unless you were looking for it, or overloading the processor so
much that it either blew the stack or triggered the watchdog resetting
the controller in the process or worst of all loading the processor down
such that it was effectively stuck for a short period of time. I managed
to eliminate the last in SW. The board was eventually redesigned to put a
one-shot on the NMI. Ugly, but workable.
Robert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: Carl D . Smith
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- References:
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: Ethan
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: Ethan
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: Carl D . Smith
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: Mike
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: R Adsett
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: Carl D . Smith
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: R Adsett
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- From: Carl D . Smith
- Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- Prev by Date: Re: Pulses in PIC
- Next by Date: Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- Previous by thread: Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- Next by thread: Re: DC Motor Control: H-Bridge +5A, 48v
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading