Re: Universal logic modules vs NAND-like modules
- From: martin griffith <martingriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 22:03:14 +0200
On Sun, 15 May 2005 17:47:13 GMT, in sci.electronics.design "Candida
Ferreira" <cferreira@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>Is there a proper name to distinguish NAND-like universal modules from
>ordinary ones, that is, the ones formed by a function F, plus NOT, plus ONE,
>and ZERO?
>
>Thanks,
>Candida
>---
>Candida Ferreira, Ph.D.
>Chief Scientist, Gepsoft
>http://www.gene-expression-programming.com/author.asp
>
>GEP: Mathematical Modeling by an Artificial Intelligence
>http://www.gene-expression-programming.com/gep/Books/index.asp
>Modeling Software
>http://www.gepsoft.com/gepsoft/
> Get APS 3.0 Std free with the book!
>
Wow, formal description.....
I'd call it an IF gate, I always have problems with formal names, I
still imagine XOR as a Diff gate, since it shows if there is a
difference.
sorry, but that wont be any help
martin
After the first death, there is no other.
(Dylan Thomas)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Universal logic modules vs NAND-like modules
- From: Candida Ferreira
- Re: Universal logic modules vs NAND-like modules
- References:
- Universal logic modules vs NAND-like modules
- From: Candida Ferreira
- Universal logic modules vs NAND-like modules
- Prev by Date: Capacitor choice for switching PSU?
- Next by Date: Re: how to remove lqfp package
- Previous by thread: Universal logic modules vs NAND-like modules
- Next by thread: Re: Universal logic modules vs NAND-like modules
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
