Re: Instruction And Data memory
- From: Rich Grise <richgrise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 21:20:46 GMT
On Mon, 23 May 2005 13:56:58 +0000, Ken Smith wrote:
> In article <pan.2005.05.22.18.27.37.278277@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> keith <krw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
>>Not at all. There is a rather big difference between the two. A modern
>>x86 doesn't do well with self-modifying code, but it can. An 8051 OTOH.
>>The first is clearly Princeton and the latter clearly Harvard.
>
> The PIC is a better example for Harvard. The 8051 uses the same bus but a
> different command signal. The PIC has a bus just for instuctions.
IIRC, I once scoured the PIC data*** - _A_ PIC data*** - to see how
hard a lookup table would be. Turns out it's a SOB.
Thanks,
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Instruction And Data memory
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: Instruction And Data memory
- From: Roger Hamlett
- Re: Instruction And Data memory
- References:
- Instruction And Data memory
- From: thejim
- Re: Instruction And Data memory
- From: keith
- Re: Instruction And Data memory
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: Instruction And Data memory
- From: keith
- Re: Instruction And Data memory
- From: Ken Smith
- Instruction And Data memory
- Prev by Date: Re: Garage sensor: How do they work ?
- Next by Date: Re: High Vbr(ebo) transistors?
- Previous by thread: Re: Instruction And Data memory
- Next by thread: Re: Instruction And Data memory
- Index(es):