Re: Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- From: Terry Pinnell <terrypinDELETE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 08:05:15 +0100
"Herbert Blenner" <a1eah71@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Replace Q1 with a PNP transistor in common collection configuration.
>Now this circuit can take advantage of the sizable current sink
>capability of the 555 timer. Further since you are now switching
>voltage across the motor, D1 is not needed.
Thanks, Herbert, but according to the LM555 data***, a 555 "output
can source or sink 200 mA."
>
>>
>> --
>> Terry Pinnell
>> Hobbyist, West Sussex, UK
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- From: Terry Given
- Re: Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- References:
- Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- From: Herbert Blenner
- Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- Next by Date: Re: About Harmonics
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- Next by thread: Re: Simple 555 PWM - disappointing performance
- Index(es):