Re: Model of EMC Conducted Emission Test Reciever - Quasi peak measurements
- From: Paul Burke <paul@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:06:07 +0100
Mark wrote:
Randomizing the frequency does not reduce the emissions, it just spreads them out so that you can pass the test. But it still creates nearly the same level of interference and to more frequencies. I know this has become a popular technique to pass EMI tests but I think it is a bad idea and just HIDES the problem.
The EMC standards are a hoop to jump through, not an objective quality standard. They say meet this curve: you meet this curve, you've passed. Don't start inventing extra obstacles, there are plenty of stupid, unnecessary ones already. RoHS/WEE anyone?
Paul Burke .
- References:
- Model of EMC Conducted Emission Test Reciever - Quasi peak measurements
- From: Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
- Re: Model of EMC Conducted Emission Test Reciever - Quasi peak measurements
- From: Mark
- Model of EMC Conducted Emission Test Reciever - Quasi peak measurements
- Prev by Date: Re: wire wrap advice
- Next by Date: Re: wire wrap advice
- Previous by thread: Re: Model of EMC Conducted Emission Test Reciever - Quasi peak measurements
- Next by thread: Re: Model of EMC Conducted Emission Test Reciever - Quasi peak measurements
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|