Re: Alternative clock display
- From: "Frank Bemelman" <f.bemelmanq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:49:06 +0200
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:vXnpe.25572$J12.44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello Guy,
>
> > Here is one that gives you the actual time instead of parroting
> > your computer's clock:
> >
> > [ http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/anim ]
>
> Just tried and it was two seconds late versus WWVB. I don't think
> accurate time can be sent via the web.
The network itself is pretty fast, it has to be -> if it
were slow all the data/traffic had to sit/wait in large
fifo buffers. That would not make sense.
If you notice a delay, it is often the server not responding
fast enough, or just too much traffic at certain nodes and
data being thrown away. The upper layers of the protocols
will retry, but then things slow down immensely.
Yet I'm always surprised when a simple ping gives a nice list
of respond times of tens of milliseconds, and even more
surprised when Google spits a full screen almost *before* I
have even touched the enter key... as if they knew what I
was going to ask ;)
--
Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'q' and 'invalid' when replying by email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Joerg
- Re: Alternative clock display
- References:
- OT: Alternative clock display
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Joerg
- OT: Alternative clock display
- Prev by Date: Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- Next by Date: Re: Alternative clock display
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternative clock display
- Next by thread: Re: Alternative clock display
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading