Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 01:00:56 GMT
Hello Joel,
I tend to waffle about it, but usually I figure that arbitrary numbers are best -- it doesn't seem there are that many cases where "100k" is the _only_ piece of information you'd like to know about the part, in which case you have to look up the rest anyway.
At the end it all boils down to how well the search functions on a parts database work. For example if you start a new design you may want to know what kinds of SOT23 transistors are already released and which ones are used on current products. This ensures that you get to share in all the candy that Purchasing receives from the vendors before Christams ;-)
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com .
- References:
- Parts Numbering Scheme
- From: Roger Lascelles
- Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- From: Joel Kolstad
- Parts Numbering Scheme
- Prev by Date: Re: PCB Layout -- A question of style
- Next by Date: Re: PCB Layout -- A question of style
- Previous by thread: Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- Next by thread: Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- Index(es):