Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- From: "Joel Kolstad" <JKolstad71HatesSpam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:44:06 -0700
"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42A63881.233D1D06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> One of the best I've ever seen, used at a pro-audio manufacturer used a
typical
> prefix and and sub-descriptor suffix follwed by the value.
>
> E.g. RA100K0 was a 2% 1/4W metal film resistor with value = 100k
So what's a 10% 100k resistor? RB100K ???
I tend to waffle about it, but usually I figure that arbitrary numbers are
best -- it doesn't seem there are that many cases where "100k" is the _only_
piece of information you'd like to know about the part, in which case you have
to look up the rest anyway.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- From: Joerg
- Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- References:
- Parts Numbering Scheme
- From: Roger Lascelles
- Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- From: Pooh Bear
- Parts Numbering Scheme
- Prev by Date: PCB Layout -- A question of style
- Next by Date: Re: PCB Layout -- A question of style
- Previous by thread: Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- Next by thread: Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|