Re: Why not closed loop speaker amplification?
- From: "Ban" <bansuri@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 05:48:28 GMT
Ross Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:58:41 -0400, Kalman Rubinson <kr4@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Jun 2005 09:45:24 -0700, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> It has been done - some years ago Philips used to sell loudspeakers
>>> that worked on this principle. They weren't all that good, probably
>>> because the position of the diaphragm is measured at one point, and
>>> the diaphragm, not being infinitely rigid, distorts under load.
>>>
>>> IIRR Philips used an accelerometer mounted on the drive coil as
>>> their "position" sensor.
>>
>> And it is currently being done on many 'servo' subwoofers.
>>
>> Kal
>
> Audio Express 9/04 described a 12" Dual Voice Coil Subwoofer system
> designed by Daniel L. Ferguson. The second voice coil is used as the
> feedback transducer.
That has been tried a lot, but the mutual coupling between the coils make
this approach pretty much useless.
--
ciao Ban
Bordighera, Italy
.
- References:
- Why not closed loop speaker amplification?
- From: Chris Carlen
- Re: Why not closed loop speaker amplification?
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Why not closed loop speaker amplification?
- From: Kalman Rubinson
- Why not closed loop speaker amplification?
- Prev by Date: Re: Famous brands decoupled from ownership?
- Next by Date: Re: Parts Numbering Scheme
- Previous by thread: Re: Why not closed loop speaker amplification?
- Next by thread: Re: Why not closed loop speaker amplification?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|