Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Tim Hubberstey <bogus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:21:31 GMT
Jim Thompson wrote:
I think I'll just stick with SocketWatch, it's working just fine, cost $10, and requires no mental capacity on my part. (Plus it has a neat "countdown" feature for setting your watch.)
Yep. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
However, you might want to verify that it keeps the PC clock adjusted between server queries. Sudden time changes can really screw up some build processes, with "interesting" results. If your PC clock runs slow, it's not usually an issue, but if it runs fast and gets set back, watch out! This is why Sun boxes allow you to speed up or slow down the clock to change the time.
--
Tim Hubberstey, P.Eng. . . . . . Hardware/Software Consulting Engineer
Marmot Engineering . . . . . . . VHDL, ASICs, FPGAs, embedded systems
Vancouver, BC, Canada . . . . . . . . . . . http://www.marmot-eng.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Alternative clock display
- References:
- OT: Alternative clock display
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Joerg
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Tim Hubberstey
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Tim Hubberstey
- Re: Alternative clock display
- From: Jim Thompson
- OT: Alternative clock display
- Prev by Date: Re: WiFi dish mod to 3.6GHz?
- Next by Date: Re: a different kind of hybrid
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternative clock display
- Next by thread: Re: Alternative clock display
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|