Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- From: "Larry Brasfield" <donotspam_larry_brasfield@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:42:04 -0700
"Don Bowey" <dbowey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:BED39AE3.5A21%dbowey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On 6/13/05 4:24 PM, in article lp4sa155402uh70aen5m09h85lho9okqvg@xxxxxxx,
> "John Fields" <jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Since the amplitude of the carrier will be varying because of the AM
>> and
>
> Tjhat is not correct. The carrier amplitude is constant with modulation.
If the carrier amplitude is constant, it is not being amplitude modulated.
This is so obvious as to be tautological. "AM" = "amplitude modulation".
--
--Larry Brasfield
email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
Above views may belong only to me.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- From: John Larkin
- Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- From: Don Bowey
- Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- References:
- AM/FM on one carrier
- From: pdrunen
- Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- From: John Fields
- Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- From: Don Bowey
- AM/FM on one carrier
- Prev by Date: Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- Next by Date: Re: RF Prototyping on a Shoe Box
- Previous by thread: Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- Next by thread: Re: AM/FM on one carrier
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading