Re: another dead HD, which do you use?
- From: John Popelish <jpopelish@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:26:51 -0400
martin griffith wrote:
2 HD's dead this month, googleling for "Hard Drive Reliabilty" gives zillions of pages of adverts saying how reliable Our HD's are. Even tomshardware didnt go into it in detail
What do you use?
BTW I notice that my latest drive must not be exposed to more than 350G's of shock. I'd accept 100G's if they lasted longer...
The trouble with this information is that by the time you have established that any brand or model has long term reliability, the design has changed. That said, I have had very good results with 3 or 4 Western Digital Caviar EIDE drives. They have all lasted in excess of 5 years (some used almost every day) and are still doing fine. They are not the high spindle speed versions, however, and all the new ones seem to run at 7200 RPM.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: another dead HD, which do you use?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: another dead HD, which do you use?
- References:
- another dead HD, which do you use?
- From: martin griffith
- another dead HD, which do you use?
- Prev by Date: Re: Meter with a log scale
- Next by Date: Re: another dead HD, which do you use?
- Previous by thread: Re: another dead HD, which do you use?
- Next by thread: Re: another dead HD, which do you use?
- Index(es):