Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: kristian.hermansen@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 23 Jun 2005 13:05:19 -0700
Ian Stirling wrote:
> For a good signal, pretty much the only thing that you could notice is that
> the bandwidth is a bit lower, as the FM signals bandwidth is about 15Khz,
> compared to the CD bandwidth of about 20Khz.
Will I lose the low or high frequency bands? I mean, will I get less
bass or less treble? What is the frequency window?
> FM radio is much, much higher quality than 64K, if you're in decent signal
> area, I'd go so far as to say that a good quality signal is usually better
> quality than 128K.
Why can it not be CDDA quality? For instance, why can't a CD be
streamed over the radio without loss in quality? The frequency of the
music is 44.1 KHz and the FM frequency is between 88-108 Mhz -- which
is a magnitude of 10^3 apart. I'm confused :-(
> As to "degradation of sound quality", you're not using a FM transmitter
> plugged into a MP3 player are you?
Yes, I am. Got me :-)
> These are generally designed down to a price, not up to best audio quality.
What if I had a high-quality transmitter?
Kristian Hermansen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: Charlie Edmondson
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: Ian Stirling
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- References:
- Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: kristian . hermansen
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: Ian Stirling
- Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Prev by Date: Re: Butterworth Filter
- Next by Date: Re: Bizzare behaviour from SG/UC3525
- Previous by thread: Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Next by thread: Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Index(es):