Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: Ian Stirling <root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Jun 2005 20:21:15 GMT
kristian.hermansen@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Ian Stirling wrote:
>> For a good signal, pretty much the only thing that you could notice is that
>> the bandwidth is a bit lower, as the FM signals bandwidth is about 15Khz,
>> compared to the CD bandwidth of about 20Khz.
>
> Will I lose the low or high frequency bands? I mean, will I get less
> bass or less treble? What is the frequency window?
Treble.
There is no real reason why you should lose bass, though it may decay under
10Hz.
>
>> FM radio is much, much higher quality than 64K, if you're in decent signal
>> area, I'd go so far as to say that a good quality signal is usually better
>> quality than 128K.
>
> Why can it not be CDDA quality? For instance, why can't a CD be
> streamed over the radio without loss in quality? The frequency of the
> music is 44.1 KHz and the FM frequency is between 88-108 Mhz -- which
> is a magnitude of 10^3 apart. I'm confused :-(
Irrelevant.
It's transmitted in a 75Khz bandwidth, about 32Khz above and below the
nominal frequency, and would have exactly the same information content
if it was centered on 88,108, or even 1Mhz.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: Tam/WB2TT
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- References:
- Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: kristian . hermansen
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: Ian Stirling
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: kristian . hermansen
- Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear device for the kitchen, yes really
- Next by Date: Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Previous by thread: Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Next by thread: Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|