Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: John Perry <jp@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:24:42 -0400
kristian.hermansen@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Charlie Edmondson wrote: ... And if not, what is the theoretical maximum source input before you start incurring loss on output? Obviously one could not send audio sampled at 20 Ghz (insane) and get all that information over to the receiver -- since 20 Ghz of information can not fit into that 108 Mhz frequency band. I synnonomize this with mapping a much larger data set ...
Kristian, you seem to have missed the repeated statement that there is no 108Mhz bandwidth -- it's _always_ a 100KHz bandwidth centered around 88.1 MHz, 88.3 Mhz, 88.5 MHz, ..., 107.9 MHz.
The FM modulation technique restricts the audio bandwidth to 15KHz for reasons others have stated. FM trades off extravagant bandwidth for excellent resistance to interference and good audio fidelity.
MP3 will be the limitation, even if its parameters are adjusted for maximum fidelity (if I understand the MP3 paradigm correctly, which I may well not). But a standard CD will have better fidelity than the FM channel because the CD is limited to 20KHz, and the FM channel is limited to 15KHz.
John Perry .
- References:
- Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: kristian . hermansen
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: Ian Stirling
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: kristian . hermansen
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: Charlie Edmondson
- Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- From: kristian . hermansen
- Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear device for the kitchen, yes really
- Next by Date: Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Previous by thread: Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Next by thread: Re: Audio quality degradation over FM transmission
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|