Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Mike Monett <no@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:53:45 -0400
Joerg wrote:
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> > A major problem with gpib is the interface is wire-or, ...
>
> The main problem I found with GPIB are those unwieldy garden hose type
> cables. Once I unhooked one and sure enough it recoiled, sending my half
> filled coffee mug sailing, crashing and spilling the contents all across
> the lab floor. On top of that it was my favorite mug.
You are missing most of the fun. In the olden days, the cables connected
various 19 inch rack-mounted equipment.
When you had to move stuff to a demo, various ill-formed and smelly people
arrived with dollies to take your precious and delicate instrumentation down 40
flights of stairs into a waiting van. From there, up 10 flights to the demo
area.
It never made it. Vibration turned the 1 inch GPIB cable into a torture rack,
severely distorting any connector that happened to be in the way, and rendering
useless any equipment mistakenly connected during the transit.
> I think Terry's path towards a TUSB uC may be a good one. Just imagine,
> replacing the garden hose with a USB cable from Walmart. Also, the cost
> for a 6ft cable would go from $100 or so to less than $10.
I am in great favor of such moves. The next best thing would be a battery
powered wireless connector that mounted on the rear of a gpib connector. Speff
described such a device recently. The Zigbee. Perfect!
> The only downside with USB is that its EMI performance is, well, not the
> best at times. RS232 would be better but many "modern" PCs don't have
> serial or parallel ports anymore. Oh well, out here we just keep a stack
> of ferrites handy.
>
> Regards, Joerg
Keep looking. There will always be someone who makes AT-compatible interfaces.
I invested in 10 AT keyboards about 20 years ago, and they are still working.
So it is logical to assume I will still be able to buy motherboards that will
connect to them. Otherwise my investment was for nought.
Hehe:)
Mike Monett
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Joerg
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- References:
- S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Joerg
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Joerg
- S-parameter test sets
- Prev by Date: Re: Boardmaker 2 - dongle required
- Next by Date: Re: WIFI TEST
- Previous by thread: Re: S-parameter test sets
- Next by thread: Re: S-parameter test sets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|