Re: 3 dB bandwidth

Pooh Bear <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Adrian Tuddenham wrote:
>
> > Kevin Aylward <see_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > There is simply no bloody law that says Bell labs original definitions
> > > mean anything at all. "I don't need to stinking Bell labs" to tell me
> > > what is a correct definition. Today, Bell labs are wrong.
> >
> > That's an interesting approach to a scientific/engineering subject.
> >
> > But you should save all that vehemence for when you will really need it:
> > ... to convince an irate customer and the Trading Standards authorities
> > that your product is fine because it meets your definition of electrical
> > units, even though it obviously doesn't meet theirs.
>
> Bell Labs definition is *not* the standard. Trading Standards would laugh at
> an attempt to refer to it.
>
> The standard is set by the AES.

Could you let me have the name or number (or URL) of the standard you
are referring to.


--
~ Adrian Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 3 dB bandwidth
    ... > Adrian Tuddenham wrote: ... > There is simply no bloody law that says Bell labs original definitions ... "I don't need to stinking Bell labs" to tell me ... > what is a correct definition. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: The truth about decibels
    ... You are dishonest and intentionally mislead the group. ... "Bell Labs definition is *not* the standard. ... voltage matched audio circuits could be correctly specified without having ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: 3 dB bandwidth
    ... > Adrian Tuddenham wrote: ... >>> laugh at an attempt to refer to it. ... >>> The standard is set by the AES. ... So 1V was never adopted as the reference and isn't ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
Quantcast