Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given <my_name@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:04:12 +1200
Joerg wrote:
Hello Keith,
I'd prefer Cat-5 and Ethernet. Indeed, I'd rather have Ethernet than _any_ USB. Connecting a device across the Internet would be a little easier too. ;-)
Agree. I always wondered why USB was conceived in the first place. It does have one advantage: Lots of DC power. Then again, two of the four CAT-5 pairs are usually vacant but the Ethernet standard lacked any power specs for a long time.
Regards, Joerg
In the mid '90s I looked very closely at USB, thinking to use it for a serial bus within high-power motor controllers, so all IO devices could be separate cards and plugged in at will.
One detailed read of the protocol was enough to kill that idea. What a dog! Trust computer scientists to pick the most complex method of doing anything.
Cheers Terry .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Joel Kolstad
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- References:
- S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Joerg
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Terry Given
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Joerg
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Keith Williams
- Re: S-parameter test sets
- From: Joerg
- S-parameter test sets
- Prev by Date: Re: S-parameter test sets
- Next by Date: Re: S-parameter test sets
- Previous by thread: Re: S-parameter test sets
- Next by thread: Re: S-parameter test sets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|