Re: Q to Win re:oscillation in high-voltage MOSFETS
- From: Robert Baer <robertbaer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:38:56 GMT
Winfield Hill wrote:
Using LTspice, i get an error message:Robert Baer wrote...
I have tried the models for the FQD2N100TM FET and have some questions.
1) The log(Is) vs Vgs relationship does not hold below about 1mA, and i need that to work to at least 1uA; preferably to 10nA.
2) I see nonlinear *gate current*: 10uA at 0V, 0uA at 50V with "knees" near 5V and 9V. I had the mistaken impression that gates were insulated from the channel, and that there were no batteries inside FETs.
3) Could you please provide a resistive SPICE single-FET circuit that might oscillate?
You're asking about the model I posted, the second one? That model is
suppose to work correctly, even to the nA region. Actually, as I said,
I developed my own modified MOSFET model before Steven Sandler's paper
came out, so it's different from his style, which was what I posted. That is, I didn't run his model in my extensive tests, having completed
my 2500V amplifier analysis before his paper. So I'll have to go back
and test and evaluate his model to verify its proper operation, and to
observe the problems you mention above. This will take more time than
I have right now, so I'll see if I can do it this coming weekend. But
don't hold your breath, because now I'm getting into the intense work
rampup prior to my going away on vacation. This may therefore be a
subject visited far in the future. But you could email me the circuits
you played with and I'll put everything in a folder to examine later.
Fatal Error: Too many parameters for subcircuit type "fqd2n100" (instance: xm1)
TopSpice does not complain, and the following shows a problem:
Test Fet (TF.CIR)
..OPTIONS ACCT LIST NODE OPTS
..TEMP 27 ;90
..DC Vg 4.50 5.00 0.001
Rin 91 01 1E6 ;Vg VS Is Looks good if low value
Rdo 92 02 1E-3
Vd 92 00 100V
Vg 91 00 4.7V
* D G S
X1 02 01 03 FQD2N100
Rs 03 04 1E-3
V2 00 04 0V ;MEASURE Is
..PRINT I(Rs)
..PLOT I(Rs)
..SAVE
..SUBCKT FQD2N100 d g s ;Note mod on designations - no help Rg g 1 0.04 M1 2 1 3 3 DMOS L=1u W=1u ..MODEL DMOS NMOS(VTO=4.66 KP=1.9 LEVEL=3) Cgs 1 3 380p Rd d 4 3.5 Dds 3 4 DDS ..MODEL DDS D(BV=1050 M=0.42 CJO=35p VJ=0.12) Dbody 3 d DBODY ..MODEL DBODY D(IS=2.8E-13 N=1.00 RS=0.005 EG=1.10 TT=520n) Ra 4 2 3.5 Rs 3 5 0.024 Ls 5 s 2.6n M2 1 8 6 6 INTER E2 8 6 4 1 2 ..MODEL INTER NMOS(VTO=0 KP=10 LEVEL=1) CGDMAX 7 4 380p RCGD 7 4 1E7 DGD 6 4 DGD RDGD 4 6 1E7 ..MODEL DGD D(M=0.52 CJO=380p VJ=0.12) M3 7 9 1 1 INTER E3 9 1 4 1 -2 ..ENDS
..END .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q to Win re:oscillation in high-voltage MOSFETS
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: Q to Win re:oscillation in high-voltage MOSFETS
- References:
- Q to Win re:oscillation in high-voltage MOSFETS
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: Q to Win re:oscillation in high-voltage MOSFETS
- From: Winfield Hill
- Q to Win re:oscillation in high-voltage MOSFETS
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with HV common emitter and push pull stage amplifier
- Next by Date: Re: Help with HV common emitter and push pull stage amplifier
- Previous by thread: Re: Q to Win re:oscillation in high-voltage MOSFETS
- Next by thread: Re: Q to Win re:oscillation in high-voltage MOSFETS
- Index(es):