Re: OT: Screen resolution popularity rankings
- From: Tom MacIntyre <tom__macintyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:24:12 GMT
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:16:18 -0400, keith <krw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:40:48 +0100, Terry Pinnell wrote:
>
>> The user at the end of this league table must have eyes like a hawk!
>> http://www.scantips.com/basics1c.html
>> (Link 'Vote', one third of way down.)
>
>I'm running 2560x1025 (dual 19" displays @ 1280x1024) here at home. At
>work it's 3200x1200 on a 15" laptop and a 20" CRT. I like lotsa pixels. ;-)
>
>BTW, over 50 and no glasses (readers occaisionally). When I was younger I
>was 20/10R and 20/15L.
I was 20:13 both when younger, still a bit better than 20:20 now.
Sadly, my near vision is a different story. Five years ago, at an
optometrist appointment, I could read the same small print as my 9 and
6 year old children. I was using 1024X768 on a 14" monitor. I worked
in electronics repair, and rarely needed a magnifier. I'll be 49 next
month, and need 1.5 on the left eye, and 1.75 on the right, just to
read or use a computer (1024X768 on a 17" or 19" monitor).
I believe there are 3 factors involved here...
1-Natural aging
2-Getting out of the repair business (if you don't use it, you lose
it)
3-Prematurely becoming dependent on the reading glasses... YMMV :-)
Tom
.
- References:
- OT: Screen resolution popularity rankings
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: OT: Screen resolution popularity rankings
- From: keith
- OT: Screen resolution popularity rankings
- Prev by Date: granted electronic patent
- Next by Date: Re: granted electronic patent
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Screen resolution popularity rankings
- Next by thread: Equivalent of Omron B3F 9100
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|