Re: The truth about decibels
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 12:25:10 -0700
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 18:49:36 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
<see_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>John Larkin wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 05:52:49 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
>> <see_website@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Its this simple mate.
>>>
>>> Zo = sqrt((R+jwL)/(G+jwC))
>>>
>>> It is *not* Z0 = sqrt(L/C)
>>>
>>> The derivation is here
>>> http://www.sm.luth.se/~urban/master/Theory/4.html
>>>
>>> R, L, C, G in per/M
>>>
>>
>> Won't any unit length work?
>>
>>
>
>Smart arse:-)
>
>
No, really, the question was sincere.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The truth about decibels
- From: Kevin Aylward
- Re: The truth about decibels
- From: keith
- Re: The truth about decibels
- References:
- Re: The truth about decibels
- From: Larry Brasfield
- Re: The truth about decibels
- From: Kevin Aylward
- Re: The truth about decibels
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The truth about decibels
- From: Kevin Aylward
- Re: The truth about decibels
- Prev by Date: Re: granted electronic patent
- Next by Date: Re: Lead-free wire soldering?
- Previous by thread: Re: The truth about decibels
- Next by thread: Re: The truth about decibels
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
