Re: standard size for smt tantalums?
- From: "B. Spitzer" <yum-y.um@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:52:22 +0200
Hi Michael,
> Hi - I was just wondering - I've noticed that there are very few
> tantalums made in the standard discrete surface mount sizes (1206,
> 0805, etc.). I was able to find a very limited selection of such
They have standard-sizes. Only the smallest fits a 1206 pad. (in
millimeters:
1.2 x 0.1 inch = 3.05mm, 0.6 x 0.1 inch = 1.53mm so an 1206 equals
a (non-existing) 3116 sized tantalum...)
The sizes are coded A or in Numbers 3216 (which means 3.2mm x 1.6mm),
B (3228), C (6032), D (7343) and E (same as D but greater hight).
Sometimes additional sizes are available (depending on the
Manufacturer.
Check out AVX, Murata, TDK
e.g. http://www.avx.com/docs/catalogs/taj.pdf
> capacitors made by TAC (for example, Digi-Key part # 478-2562-1-ND).
> But these are expensive (over $2 each for an 0805 in quantites of
> 100, compared to $.50 for similarly specced tantalums in different
> packages). So my question is this: Are there standard sizes for
> tantalums? Or does each manufacturer have their own sizes?
As others alredy mentioned... these might be ceramic caps.
> As long as I'm on the topic of tantalums - can somebody tell me why
> they are reccomended for power smoothing? Would a ceramic work just
> as well? (as they're cheaper and available in sizes I'm more used to)
Ceramics work much better (lower ESR, long-term stability) but are
much more expensive (you mentioned $2 each).
Many (not cost-sensitive) designers prefer to use ceramics, since they
are much more reliable than tantalums.
cu
Bernhard Spitzer
--
bash.org - Top 100...
<erno> hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it
works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is.
.
- References:
- standard size for smt tantalums?
- From: Michael Noone
- standard size for smt tantalums?
- Prev by Date: Re: ATTENTION!!!!!! We have assumed control.
- Next by Date: Digikey policy change on backorders
- Previous by thread: Re: standard size for smt tantalums?
- Next by thread: Lightning protection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|