Re: hello NASA, using the old junk box?
- From: larwe@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Jul 2005 09:19:21 -0700
> >Redesigning any of the consumer products I work with to, say, change
> >one transistor type, is a minimum cost of six to nine months and
> >$100,000 of direct costs in engineering, QA testing, FCC
>
> That is just so depressing
So you'll be happy this winter to see your house burned down and family
suffocated because the replacement transistor I put in your wireless
smoke detector didn't work correctly at low temperatures and the Tx
frequency was off by 2MHz?
I can tell you I won't be happy to see my signature on the multimillion
dollar recall (and lawsuits) that this little oops would generate.
For some industries, $100,000 and 9 months in testing really doesn't
seem like much after all, does it?
.
- References:
- Re: hello NASA, using the old junk box?
- From: martin griffith
- Re: hello NASA, using the old junk box?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bulk erase methods
- Next by Date: Re: Bulk erase methods
- Previous by thread: Re: hello NASA, using the old junk box?
- Next by thread: Re: hello NASA, using the old junk box?
- Index(es):