Re: OT: We got it up!

Jim Thompson wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:10:31 +0100, Pooh Bear
> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Jim Thompson wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:55:49 -0700, John Larkin
> >> <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >> >
> >> >No, one could also move earth to a further-out orbit. Turns out that
> >> >it's not hard.
> >> >
> >> >John
> >> >
> >>
> >> Oh? Really ?:-)
> >>
> >> ...Jim Thompson
> >
> >I confess, I want to hear more about this.
> >
> >Graham
>
> I believe we are so inextricably gravity-interrelated with the other
> planets that meddling would result in a disaster.
>
> Not to say the Democrats won't try it some day, and we'll end up
> falling into the sun :-(

You reckon the Republicans aren't capable of similarly screwing up ? :-o

Graham

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Op-amp Settings
    ... > Jim Thompson wrote: ... >>>The post is a troll... ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: We got it up!
    ... >>Jim Thompson wrote: ... >>I confess, I want to hear more about this. ... > planets that meddling would result in a disaster. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: amplifier stability and compensation
    ... Jim Thompson wrote: ... typical academia for you. ... Graham ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Gold edge connectors.
    ... Jim Thompson wrote: ... > I ran across an interesting MIL spec this past week that said, ... Graham ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: We got it up!
    ... >Jim Thompson wrote: ... >I confess, I want to hear more about this. ... Sometimes I even put it in the food. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)