Re: LED display design



On 28 Jul 2005 20:28:16 -0700, "captsomer" <destinyyacht@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>Hey everyone,
>
>Thanks for all of the ideas! You guys are a big help. I appreciate it.
>Hey Mochuelo, what was your idea?

Without isolation, I see two options:
-------------------------------------
1) "Low-efficiency" option.

With only two resistors, arranged as in
http://80.35.195.131/ng/20050729_Solution_1.png
(server not always up)
Each resistor needs to be 3.9 kohm, 0.5 W.

Approximate results:
I_led_max = 21.4 mA
Efficiency = 52 %
P_out_avg = 0.60 W (average total output power, at the LEDs)
Flicker (at each LED) = 60 Hz
-------------------------------------
2) "High-efficiency" option.

With 4 resistors, 3 capacitors (actually, one is to fine tune the led
current), and 4 diodes, arranged as in
http://80.35.195.131/ng/20050729_Solution_2.png

All resistors may be 0.125 W, or even smaller. C1 needs to sustain
around 230 V, and C2, 100 V. For instance, Digi-Key ref numbers:
C1a: EF2185-ND (1.8 uF, 250 V, 0.9600 USD)
C1b: fines tune I_led_max. Around 100 nF, with my model.
C2 : 493-1668-ND (100 uF, 100 V, 0.4500 USD)

Approximate results:
I_led_max = 20.5 mA
Efficiency = 90 %
P_out_avg = 2.2 W (average total output power, at the LEDs)
Flicker (at each LED) = 120 Hz
-------------------------------------

Solution #2 is not only more efficient, but it also delivers much more
average power to the LEDs, without increasing their stress (actually,
with a slightly lower stress), thanks to the averaging effect of C2.
You will have about 4 times more light with sol #2. Thanks to the
bridge, you will also have a much better flicker. Of course, it is a
little bit more expensive, but for me, it is worth. RS is an inrush
current limiter, and R1 "bleeds" C1. The diode bridge can be a cheap
and small one (even smd). It must sustain 200 V. Its current rating is
not a problem. I was thinking of solution #2 for you.



>Thanks all,
>Shawn
>Mochuelo wrote:
>> On 27 Jul 2005 22:00:02 -0700, "captsomer" <destinyyacht@xxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I need to build a sign. It will have 7 letters and I want to use LED's
>> >to backlight it. I'm going to need to light about 40 of them. I have
>> >tinkered around with LED's in the past and I have a basic knowledge,
>> >but I thought I'd ask others for thier opinion before I spend all of
>> >this time and money.
>> >
>> >This circuit needs to be powered by 110 VAC. The LED's are 3.6v @ 20mA.
>> >Should I use a lower voltage power supply? Are there schematics for
>> >projects like this on the web that might come close to what I'm doing?
>> >Series or paralell?
>> >
>> >Help!
>> >Shawn
>>
>> Do you need isolation? (If you were using bulbs, you probably would
>> not have it, either). If you don't need it, there is a cheap
>> alternative with very few capacitors, resistors and diodes. Let me
>> know if you want to go this way.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Diode question
    ... Use resistive pads at the outputs of the two radios and a resistive ... resistors. ... Use a stereo-to-monaural isolation transformer backwards. ... >feeds one stereo input and the monaural winding feeds your single speaker. ...
    (rec.boats.electronics)
  • Re: capacitances in parallel
    ... the capacitances in parallel in add up. ... ** Forget making false comparisons with resistors or inductors. ... Caps have the unique ability to store energy in isolation. ... The magnets don't have cooling equipment as such, ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)

Quantcast