Definition of Pirates Was: OT: We got it up!
- From: "Aubrey McIntosh, Ph.D." <newsposter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:34:39 -0500
John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:39:38 GMT, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian <eatmyshorts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The point was, "terrorism" is the last line of defense of a people who are being invaded by the inexorable US war machine.
That's absurd. The first attempt to bring down the WTC was in 1992. Islamic terrorists have been bringing down planes and ships for decades. These guys aren't acting on the behalf of, or for the welfare of, any people but themselves. They want to be the Taliban, to rule absolutely without anyone's vote or consent, to keep their women down and send their young men off to die, leaving that many more young women for themselves.
There is an article at
<http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/July-August-2005/feature_burgess_julaug05.msp>
that argues to legally define "terrorists" as "pirates" in order to bring mature and accepted law to bear.
One of the implications is the jurisdiction issue: pirates could be captured wherever they were found, by anyone who found them.
Now, we just need an electronic pirate locator circuit.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definition of Pirates Was: OT: We got it up!
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Definition of Pirates Was: OT: We got it up!
- References:
- OT: We got it up!
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: OT: We got it up!
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: OT: We got it up!
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: We got it up!
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: OT: We got it up!
- From: Ken Smith
- Re: OT: We got it up!
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: OT: We got it up!
- From: John Larkin
- OT: We got it up!
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: We got it up!
- Next by Date: Re: OT: We got it up!
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: We got it up!
- Next by thread: Re: Definition of Pirates Was: OT: We got it up!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|