Re: atomically correct time

"Rich Grise" <richgrise@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.08.05.22.13.34.454826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 07:37:57 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> > On 5 Aug 2005 14:34:46 GMT, et472@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Black)
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Ben Bradley (ben_nospam_bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
> >>> I at first thought the subject was "Anatomically correct time."
> >>> Surely that's no reflection of what's on my mind...
> >>>
> >>No, for some reason the same thought crossed my mind.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >
> > Me too ;-)
>
> OK, did anybody _NOT_ read "anatomically correct time"? ;-)
>
> Cheers!
> Rich
>
I keep reading it that way *every* time I see the damn thing! :-)

Ken


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: atomically correct time
    ... for some reason the same thought crossed my mind. ... >>> Michael ... Engineers are all alike;-) ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: atomically correct time
    ... for some reason the same thought crossed my mind. ... >>> Michael ... our brains filled in the closest most likely real word ... Still Rich ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: atomically correct time
    ... >> Surely that's no reflection of what's on my mind... ... for some reason the same thought crossed my mind. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: how do people feel about exit function from loop
    ... shorter isn't a reason to code it that way every time. ... really need it, but ALWAYS (never mind "most often"), there are ways ... Michael ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Michael Dirda and the moral confusion of Post Modern narrative
    ... I love Michael Dirda’s commentary in Book World. ... Golden Rule is a product of reason. ... Mike Boorda is that Abraham was expressing his duty to God, ...
    (alt.politics.bush)