Re: PROTEL question
- From: "JeffM" <jeffm_@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Aug 2005 12:55:41 -0700
>I'd like to fit two or more schematics/PCBs on the same sheet
> orangeKDS @ mail.ru
I notice that you don't include context when you respond.
FYI, this is Usenet.
Google Groups is one way of accessing Usenet,
but is is not the entirety of Usenet.
Most folks use a "newsreader" to read the Usenet newsgroups.
http://www.google.com/search?&q=gravity+forte+xnews+40tude+mozilla
That means that THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE
(who don't read the group at Google) DON'T SEE WHAT YOU SEE ON GOOGLE.
See how I went back and added a bit of your previous post to this post?
That is called **context**.
To get context the easy way:
(hint: DON'T CLICK THE **Reply** LINK THAT IS IN PLAIN SIGHT),
click the **show options** link, then click THAT Reply link.
You don't have to re-post **everything** from the previous post;
feel free to snip out as much from the automated blockquote as you
wish.
I only leave enough to show what part I'm referencing ("context").
See above.
DO NOT snip out the name of the person to whom you are responding.
Reading some threads and observing how others post,
will give you a boilerplate for your posts.
..
..
Rich Grise (pointedly) remarks on context here:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.electronics.design/browse_frm/thread/3e13158594651a47/1569906f59f22fb6?q=include-context-when-you-post-from-google-groups+are-universally-hated+include-context
The guidelines for proper Usenet posting are here:
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:8PaSp2kKbWoJ:www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html+just-enough+at-*-top-*-*-message+do-not-*-*-*-original+zzz+One-to-Many-Communication
(Worth scanning--especially the parts I've highlighted.)
.
- References:
- PROTEL question
- From: orangeKDS
- PROTEL question
- Prev by Date: Re: School Photos
- Next by Date: Determine switching frequency of photocoupler
- Previous by thread: Re: PROTEL question
- Next by thread: DVI Dongle / Cable for Suspend Mode
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
